The Year the Scoreboard Broke: Why 2025 Looks Like the Best Year for Billionaires—and Why the Rest of the Country Pays Interest on It

Stop Using Our Military As Thieves

A modern economy is an information system. Markets are the dashboards. Prices are the signals. And wealth, especially billionaire wealth, is what happens when the system’s signals compound in one direction for long enough.

By that measure, 2025 reads like a record year for the very top—not as a moral claim, but as a measurable outcome. UBS reports that global billionaire wealth reached an all-time high in 2025 (about $15.8 trillion, up 13%) and ties the jump to technology-driven gains and a historic inheritance wave.¹ Bloomberg’s Billionaires Index data, reported at year-end, describes a record $2.2 trillion increase in wealth among the world’s 500 richest people during 2025—a single-year surge large enough to look unreal in any prior decade.²

That is what “best year” means in plain terms: the asset engines that disproportionately power billionaire balance sheets—equities, founder stakes, private valuations, and risk-on capital—ran hot, and they ran hot all year. The scoreboard didn’t just move. It moved so fast that a small handful of people accounted for a meaningful fraction of total gains.²

Now bring in the other national dashboard—the one that doesn’t trend on social media, but determines how much policy oxygen we have left: interest on the public debt.

The Interest Meter: The Cost of Borrowing Has Become a First-Order Budget Problem

Interest is not a political theory. It is arithmetic.

If the government carries debt (D) and pays an average interest rate (r), then yearly interest cost is:

Interest Cost≈D×r

When either (D) rises (more debt) or (r) rises (higher rates), the product rises. When both rise together, interest behaves like a ratchet.

That’s where the United States has been living. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects net interest outlays rising sharply over the coming decade, reaching levels that consume a growing share of federal spending and GDP.³ And independent fiscal analysts, drawing from CBO baselines, have put the near-term figures into blunt budget language: interest costs around the high hundreds of billions now, trending toward about a trillion dollars per year soon, with cumulative interest over the next decade measured in the tens of trillions.⁴⁵

This matters for a reason senior decision-makers understand instinctively: interest is spending with no new service delivered. It doesn’t buy a bridge, a clinic, or a teacher. It’s the “keep the lights on” payment for past choices. When that line item rises, it competes with everything else—especially the kind of patient, community-level investment that prevents downstream costs in health, crime, and instability.³⁴

So we end up with a structurally destabilizing contrast:

• Asset appreciation and concentrated equity ownership made 2025 unusually good at the top.¹²

• Debt service and higher rates made the same era unusually expensive for public capacity.³⁴⁵

You don’t need a revolution to diagnose the problem. Bernstein would call this what it is: a system that must be reformed through durable institutions, because the drift—left alone—will harden into structure.

What Could We Fund Instead? Three Nationwide Community Investments That Rebuild Neighborhood “Stickiness”

Local communities don’t collapse only from poverty. They collapse when the incentives to belong disappear: no safe places to gather, no stable housing pathway, no accessible care, no dignified work pipeline, and no institutions that treat people as future neighbors instead of present liabilities.

Here are three concrete social investments that could be funded nationally and implemented locally—designed like a modern data platform: standardized where necessary, adaptable where it matters, and measured for outcomes rather than slogans.

1) A National “Neighborhood Commons” Grant Program (Third Places + Safety + Civic Infrastructure)Think of this as rebuilding the physical layer that makes community possible: parks, libraries, recreation centers, afterschool spaces, main-street improvements, lighting, and community-led safety design. The point is not beautification. The point is reestablishing reliable places where people repeatedly interact in non-transactional ways. If you want neighbors to care about their block, you need a block that invites care.

2) A Housing Stability + Community Land Trust Accelerator (Keep Residents Rooted Where They Live)Communities cannot cohere when residents churn. A national accelerator that expands community land trusts, supports affordable home repair, and reduces displacement risk functions like a stabilizer in a control system. You are lowering volatility in the household layer so social ties have time to form. In economic terms: less forced mobility, more durable local networks, better downstream outcomes for schools, local businesses, and public safety.

3) A Community Behavioral Health & Recovery Network (Clinics + Mobile Response + Local Partnerships)Every judge, police chief, and hospital administrator already knows the truth: untreated mental illness and addiction become an informal “tax” paid through ERs, jails, homelessness systems, and family courts. A community network—clinics, mobile crisis response, and recovery support integrated with local nonprofits—reduces the high-cost back-end spending by addressing needs at the front door. It also restores public trust, because residents stop seeing disorder as permanent and ungoverned.

These are not utopian programs. They are capacity programs—the kind that make neighborhoods legible, safe, and worth investing in again.

The Closing Question: What Would We Choose If We Didn’t Know Who We’d Be?

Rawls’s veil of ignorance is not a sermon. It’s a decision procedure.

If you didn’t know whether you would be born into the billionaire class or into a neighborhood struggling to keep a school open, you would still want markets. You would still want innovation. But you would also insist on guardrails that prevent the public balance sheet from becoming a silent transfer mechanism: private compounding up top, public compounding in interest payments below.

That is the strategic frame for senior audiences: not envy, not punishment—system design. If 2025 was the best year for billionaires, the question for 2026 is whether we can still afford a republic that pays ever more to service yesterday’s debt while underinvesting in tomorrow’s neighborhoods.

Sources

1. UBS, UBS Billionaire Ambitions Report 2025: The Rise of a New Generation (Media Release, Dec. 4, 2025).

2. John Authers et al., World’s Richest Added a Record $2.2 Trillion in Wealth in 2025, Led by Musk, Ellison, Bloomberg (Dec. 31, 2025).

3. Cong. Budget Off., The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2025 to 2035 (2025), https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61172.

4. Peter G. Peterson Found., Any Way You Look at It, Interest Costs on the National Debt Will Soon Be at an All-Time High (2025).

5. Comm. for a Responsible Fed. Budget, Interest on the Debt to Grow Past $1 Trillion Next Year (Feb. 6, 2025).

6. Oxfam Int’l, Billionaire Wealth Surges by $2 Trillion in 2024, Three Times Faster Than the Year Before (Press Release, Jan. 2025).